Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as being a screen in to the clinical process

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as being a screen in to the clinical process

Current Reviews

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this coming Saturday, on August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a weblog about retractions?”

exactly What is now clear into the intervening nine years is exactly what a rich vein retractions are as tales of what goes on whenever one thing goes incorrect in technology. So that as we now have done on a yearly basis at the moment, we’ll review what occurred within the last 12 months.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Researchers in Asia have actually lost a 2019 paper on what LSD may damage vision because they’d lifted a lot of the paper from articles which had showed up the season before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.

The article that is retracted “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In line with the article:

Share this:

Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper

A dermatology journal has retracted a 2017 article by a couple of scientists in Saudi Arabia after getting a complaint that is“serious about the integrity associated with the information. Nevertheless the very first writer of the paper pressed right straight back, saying the move ended up being unjustified.

This article, “Successful usage of blended corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” had been published by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgical treatment. It described (with instead grisly photos) the outcome of a man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that fixed after the described combination treatment.

But during the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends very first author of retracted Kumamoto quake paper

The initial writer of a now-retracted paper in technology in regards to the aftereffects of the life-threatening 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan happens to be suspended from their college position for just one year.

Intending Lin, associated with Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, had been sanctioned by the organization for misconduct stemming from their abuse of information and plagiarism into the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, high-risk and deceptive” attention research; genetics’ high retraction price

Before we provide this week’s sunday Reads, a concern: would you enjoy our weekly roundup? If that’s the case, we’re able to actually make use of your assistance. Can you think about a tax-deductible contribution to help sunday Reads, and our everyday work? Many Thanks beforehand.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: can you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever desired to hone your talent as being a systematic sleuth? Now’s your opportunity.

as a result of the United states Society for Biochemistry and Biology that is molecular(, that is dedicated to educating writers on recommendations in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a string, Forensics Friday.

Have a look at the image below, and then take our poll. From then on, go through the website link below to discover the answer that is right.

Share this:

Cock and bull tale contributes to retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients had thing for hybrids (think pets, maybe maybe maybe not automobiles): half goat-half people, horses with individual torsos, winged horses and lions, you will get the image. But a chicken-cow mix wasn’t on that list … until now.

A small grouping of scientists in Brazil has lost a paper in a journal that is veterinary wanting to reuse information from a chicken research within their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

This article, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never impact virus replication,” starred in February when you look at the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information make fluorosis paper a banner

A present article that provided a stark caution concerning the dangers to young ones of fluoride within the nation’s water happens to be tagged with a manifestation of concern following the publication of a fresh paper which undermines the reliability for the initial information.

The content, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” appeared in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a journal that is dental. The first writer on the paper is Christopher Neurath, associated with the United states Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

The content, that used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) when it comes to years 2011 and 2012, reported “large increases in extent and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to towards the mid-1980s.

Based on the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational industries, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: exactly exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” go into in a journal that is peer-reviewed?

Often, a paper arrives this is certainly therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore as opposed to attempt to do justice to a paper that is recent Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets phrase of concern

Articles claiming to uproot the tree that is evolutionary of has gotten a manifestation of concern after having a audience notified the log about prospective difficulties with the information.

The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of the putative missing link sparks reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 of this 12 months. Based on the writers — a worldwide group that includes scientists in the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences pay for papers review, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:

Leave a Comment